Last year
Caro and I went to a Halloween party. It
was our first Halloween since having Sam, and since he was ten months old
already, he was sleeping on his own through the night. We left him with his sister, Gabri, who
obligingly babysat for the night, as she had done earlier that month when we
were in Chicago. I guess this is one of
the perks of your kid’s having much older siblings.
Anyway, we
went to this party at our friends’ house a few blocks away. I came up with the idea of dressing as some
sort of a missionary and his exotic local wife.
The main criteria that entered into this were the last-minute ready
availability of clothes to dress the part.
I just wore khakis and a formal collared shirt, put on a nametag, and
carried around an old-looking book (which, incidentally, was not actually the
Bible). I guess my main esthetic
inspiration was the Mormon missionaries from the US that you sometimes see
around Colombia or any other developing country, but I could have been from any
denomination. The idea was just to look
clean-shaven, very much from the US, and rigidly out of place. My wife Caro dressed up in a color-print
two-piece dress I got her in Benin when I was doing thesis research, and a more
or less matching head scarf she’d gotten in Laos (where she was doing her
research while I was in Benin).
I thought
we looked good, with a visual authenticity and a tongue-in-cheek flair. I did wonder if our outfits were somehow
offensive, though in the end I didn’t worry about it. I mean, we basically went as a silly
exaggeration of what we are—a binational couple, one from the US and the other
from a developing country. On top of
that, I am a development worker, which is pretty much like a missionary (though
my wife is a development worker too, and frankly the nature of our work and our
interests has me more in the role of backwards, exotic peasant in the
backcountry, and my wife in a more formal professional role). So I don’t think we offended anyone, though
it was a bit odd to ask ourselves to what extent our costumes were costumes and
to what extent they represented who we really are!
No one at
the party exactly got what we were trying to convey with the costumes,
especially in my case, since I was dressed essentially as I always dress, just
with a nametag. One person came up to my
wife and said something like, “I don’t mean to be offensive, but is that a
costume, or how you always dress? I
mean, are you Afro-Colombian?” My wife
didn’t quite know what to say, and stuttered out something like, “Well, yeah,
part of my family is black, but I don’t really dress like this. I’m supposed to be dressed as an exotic
native.”
Some months
later we went to a distant niece’s quinceañera party. I know that in the US lots of Latinos make a
big, official deal out of a girl’s quinceañera, but it’s not really a common
custom here in Colombia. I mean, people
have a larger-than-normal party for a girl’s 15th birthday, but
there’s no formal Mass or official ritual for such a celebration. That said, I get the impression that some
wealthy people in Colombia are starting to institute the quinceañera as a way
to showcase their wealth and their love for their daughters. This party we went to was more or less such
an affair. At an exclusive social club
in Bogota, with a huge guest list, a delicious multi-course meal, and even a
live reggaeton singer that I was informed was actually a known name. Caro’s niece did a choreographed dance with
hired dancers to a Beyonce Knowles song, and went through various dress changes
in the course of the night, according to the different moments in the night’s
program.
I reflected
on a number of things during this party, beyond the delicious food and the fun my wife and I had dancing together.
First, that it takes a certain type of family to put one of these things
together. A comfort with attention and
ostentation, a certain lack of shame, certainly. But on the positive side, such an event
implies a sincerity, a lack of acidic irony, and is an important ritual marking of the girl’s entry into
adulthood. In particular I was impressed
with the niece’s performance throughout.
She exuded a confidence and a comfort with being in the spotlight at key
moments, but didn’t seem ugly or like a ham or anything. If our teenage charges had been there, they
probably would have laughed at the tacky presumption of it all, and they’d be
right to. But on the other hand, I don’t
know that either would have had the presence of character to do all that
dancing and singing in front of everyone.
Beyond
this, I reflected that this was another event in which we were donning
costumes. In this case it was a suit for
me and a lovely dress for my wife. Both
outfits were very far from our habitual dress, and the attitude of ease and
wealthy joviality we and everyone else assumed for the party were also
different from our everyday, “real” selves.
I didn’t feel artificial. Just
conscious of our costumes, of the special nature of the event. In fact, I think it’s good to wear costumes
at times. For much of our history as a
species I imagine people have used different clothing for different occasions
and activities. In the early 21st-century,
I sometimes feel that we are standardizing our dress into sloppy T-shirts and
jeans, which is no less a costume than any other, but would certainly represent a
cultural loss if it or any other outfit were to become the only one we ever
wear.
As I mentioned,
my teenage charges were not in attendance.
They didn’t know their cousin that well, and at any rate the party
wasn’t their type of scene. I understood
this, but frankly I knew the girl even less than they did, and I’m certainly
not given to big, fancy private club parties.
As I’ve mentioned in a recent blog post, I am concerned when these kids of ours don’t participate in family events.
I wonder if it will lead to the disintegration of the extended
family. If their lack of interest is
just a temporary, teenage thing, then I don’t mind that much. But sometimes I worry that they’ll stay that
way, like certain friends and family members we know who are in their 30s and
still act like goofy, unthinking teens.
In the year since this particular party, both Gabri and Manu have been
generally a lot better about participating in family events. But I still worry.
Despite the
positive spin the magazine was trying to put on its analysis, it still would
have pissed me off when I was a teenager.
Back then (as now), I just wanted people to treat me like a human being,
like a normal person, without classifying me or second-guessing what I was
doing. Imagine if, in response to
everything you did, people said or implied that you acted that way because of
your age, or your race, or your economic status. We do this to teenagers all the time when we
fixate on their being teens as a means of explaining (or even pathologizing)
their thoughts or actions. I realize
that there are indeed physical and chemical changes occurring in adolescents,
and the National Geographic article helped me to understand some of them. But as a teen, I was just trying to act
coherently and decently, as I do now, and I wanted the respect that such
behavior merits at any age. I didn’t
want to be analyzed or pigeonholed.
For me
family and work have always been important.
I like being around family, and I like working, especially doing skilled
manual labor like fixing things around the house or building things. As a teenager, and especially as one that
felt sort of insulted and demeaned by the very idea of being a teenager, I
think I further latched onto these two things so as to feel more adult. I felt it was very important to go to family
gatherings, even if I wasn’t always in the mood to talk much with my parents
from day to day. And doing useful, adult
work validated me, made me feel grown-up.
I don’t think I was ever very lazy, or had many “typical” teenage days
of just sleeping in all day. When I was
about 12, my friends and I would lie around after intense basketball sessions,
and joke about how lazy we were, not even wanting to get up to serve ourselves
more food or drink. But that was about
as close to lazy as I ever got. Today I
don’t brook laziness in anyone, and I don’t consider adolescence as a valid
excuse for being lazy. Even as a
teenager I despised laziness in other kids, and this was compounded because I
felt that it gave all us teens a bad name.
I remember one summer day when I was 18 or 19 already, and I was sort of
mentoring a friend’s boyfriend’s 14-year-old brother. We were with a bunch of my friends, and all
they wanted to do was sit around under a fan.
The younger kid and I spent all day in and out of the house, fixing
things, hiking around, swimming, and every time we passed through I was amazed
to see my own friends just sitting there like slugs!
In short, I
was perhaps not a typical teenager, at least if the stereotypes and National
Geographic truly depict typical adolescence.
I wanted the genuine respect of other people, and I tried to earn it by
being coherent and correct and responsible.
Surely I didn’t always live up to these standards, but I tried. Later on in life, I have at times regretted
being so serious and trying to be so grown-up as a teenager; maybe I would have
had a better time and learned more if I just enjoyed the moment and didn’t
worry about appearing immature to others.
In this respect, I often feel that I still exhibit certain adolescent
tendencies, perhaps because I never officially closed a clear, obvious phase of
adolescence in my life. I still like to
try new things, sometimes even to the point of taking irresponsible risks. I am still curious and rebellious and I think
I still feel quite a bit of wonder at the world around me, as a teenager does
when he drives for the first time, or sees a grown-up movie, or kisses a girl. Is this seemingly prolonged adolescence a good
thing, or a sign of a stunted development because I didn’t let myself act like
a teenager when I actually was?
Maybe I’m
not so atypical. Maybe lots of people
have continued their adolescence into middle age, or maybe this isn’t at all a
continuation of adolescence, but simply one part of being an adult. I’ve met adults in many different places who,
for better or worse, still act like kids in many ways. Furthermore, even though my friends and I
were relatively calm and well-behaved teenagers, we did have some “typical”
adolescent growing pains, and most of us seem to be fully-developed, normal
adults. We tried light drugs and liquor,
we argued with our parents, we fell in and out of love and lust. Maybe this adolescence, relatively drama-free
and tranquil, is in fact the norm.
At any
rate, I hope my son Sam has a normal adolescence, which is to say a time of
testing and discovery, surely with some idiocy and incoherence along the
way. I don’t want him to be as serious
and self-righteous and self-conscious as I was, though from the contemplative attitude
he’s borne since birth, I have a feeling he will fall into some of my same
habits. But part of what passes as “normal”
adolescence for many people that I don’t want to deal with in Sam is
laziness. I want him to be at least somewhat
responsible, active, motivated. I wonder
if I can help him along in this by assigning him certain responsibilities in
the household, like washing the dishes or milking the cow. In my own experience, both as a teenager with
a fair amount of household responsibilities, and as an adult observer of teens with
and without responsibilities, it seems that having these duties makes kids feel
grown-up (indeed, if responsibility for others is the hallmark of adulthood, it
doesn’t just make them feel grown-up but in fact makes them grown-up). I often think that much of the dangerous and
self-destructive behavior teens are wont to engage in, like joining gangs or
doing drugs or fucking promiscuously, are things that make them feel grown-up. These things are a warped vision of adulthood
held by kids who’ve rarely been called upon to act as responsible, healthy
adults. My theory is that feeling
useful, alongside feeling loved, is a big part of what can steer a teenager
toward relatively wise life choices.
This idea of feeling useful is something we’ve perhaps forgotten in a
post-agrarian society, where even as adults we often feel more like a burden on
the world than like a productive force. If
we remember that work is not degrading or undignified but in fact exalts a
person, we will see that keeping our children from working and contributing to
the household economy is not a privilege or a benefit to them, but rather a way
to make them feel useless and immature.
I could be
wrong, and Sam will still be a lazy goof-off even if he has to milk cows and
clean sheds and fix dinner. But even in
that case, at least we’ll have milk and a hot meal and an orderly house. It reminds me of a carpenter who fixed
something here at our house in Bogota, and he was ragging on his kid for being
lazy and not getting up until 7am to come to work with him during school break. Maybe his kid was lazy in that household’s
standards. But I looked at my teenage
charges that day, and they were still asleep in bed at 10am, and certainly
weren’t planning on helping with carpentry around the house. If you set the bar high enough, even
underachievement can be pretty productive!
No comments:
Post a Comment