More on bad science and nutrition reporting

This is an article about a guy who intentionally ran a poorly-designed experiment, published the results in a low-quality journal, and then publicized them with mainstream media, all to make the point that mainstream science and nutrition journalism hardly deserves to be called any of the three.  The article discusses the (un)ethics of what the guy did, but also the shoddy work of "journalists" who didn't even consult sources or question the statistic rigor of the experiment.