My wife recently read an article about a retired military man and his family in Colombia, who for many years kept a young girl from a rural area as their personal slave. One of the family’s daughters, after living for years with the anguishing knowledge that what her beloved family was doing was gravely wrong, finally spoke up about it.
Now the couple has been judged guilty on charges of slavery, the first
such legal decision of its kind in Colombia for a practice that my wifeimagines was relatively common in the recent past (and still exists in
other countries that are in the earlier stages of the agrarian-urban
transition, like Haiti), despite the news coverage's insistence on characterizing the case as "aberrant". In the case at
hand, the couple received a rural family’s daughter as a “favor”, and assured
them that the child would receive all the benefits of an urban, wealthy
upbringing. Instead she worked from dawn
to dusk and beyond, every day for her entire childhood, cleaning the house,
making food, and getting sexually abused by the father and his brothers. The child was beaten if she did her work in a
way that the family didn’t like, and was severely punished when she began to
teach herself how to read.
At any rate, it seems that good
prevailed in this case, and the conscientious daughter did the right thing
(though it cost her the hatred and estrangement of the rest of the family). The parents must now pay economic and moral
reparations (the latter consisting in putting the slave girl back in touch with
her real family, and the former in back pay for all those years of work). My limited understanding of the Colombian
legal system and general mentality gives me the impression that such
punishments are common. Even in cases of
war crimes and such, the sentence for the perpetrator often focuses on the idea
of reparation of wrongs done, as opposed to receiving sheer punishment or
suffering in return for a crime. This is
probably for the better—a country at war cannot afford to add more brutality
into the mix by harsh, nasty sentencing for offenders, and righting wrongs is
more effective than vengeance to achieve a lasting peace. And I would never advocate the arbitrary,
counterproductive penal system of the USA, where petty drug offenders get
brutalized by hardened prisoners, while the stuffed suits that brought down our
entire economy receive a slap on the wrist.
Still though, in a case like
this my Puritan US roots make me wonder if reparation is the right tack. Personally I’d like to see these slaveowners
made to suffer. They robbed a girl of
her youth, of her humanity, of her very body and sexual organs. If it were up to me, they’d be sent to a
brutal US-style prison to be anally raped with broom handles and razor blades
and other such objects. Justice should
not usually be about making an example of people, but in this case, as in the many
cases of impunity and brash abuse that plague Colombia, I’d like to see a clear
statement that these things won’t be tolerated.
All too often I feel that the worst people, doing the worst things, are
then judged lightly by generally open-minded, forgiving souls, and so other
bad eggs get the idea that they can get away with things like massacres,
embezzling, paramilitary violence, and now even slavery.
I do not necessarily believe that only bad
people do bad things. But this is all
the more reason for severity, at least in certain emblematic cases. If we are all indeed capable of such
monstrosities, then brute fear of punishment has an important role to play in
keeping our worst demons in line.
No comments:
Post a Comment